This is a serious topic...I'm very sincere and please don't make a mockery of this...
We know now that most of Howard's pre-fame life has been a lie. A charade he created to identify with the commoners and losers and social retards and borderline personalities, ect. (i.e. most of YOU PEOPLE)...the great, unwashed masses. A carnie act to make you gullible plebeians believe he was one of you and spoke for you and could feel your pain as you fell to your knees and tearfully crowned him KING OF ALL MEDIA.
We now know he wasn't some pathetic loser who almost never got laid until marriage and only did once or twice when women were stoned and felt sorry for him. We now know that he did in fact bang entire summer camps of women, not to mention entire offices of women with some models in between.
It was a lie and among a series of lies to make you think he was as big a loser as you.
This is just one of many examples. I won't even go into the fact that not only was he NOT beaten up by the blaecks everyday of his life in Roosevelt, the exact opposite was true. Now of course it goes without saying that the blaeks, despite being the superior athuhlete, would NEVER even be able to catch a young Howard Stern (no one can outrun Howard-not even blaeks) to beat him...Howard actually was the leader of a blaek gang that terrorized Roosevelt for years until he finally moved away to bang models in college. Howard was the one white guy the blaeks actually feared and respected so much they let him into the gang (y'know, like Jeff Goldblum in Death Wish) and he quickly seized control of it.
But none of that matters, like I said, just a series of charades to identify with you which is why it has to be asked....
Is Howard's small penis yet another lie? Another charade to be self-deprecating and identify with the common joe loser when all evidence should now point to the contrary of his 30+ years of claims...
Howard Stern = hung like Lexington Steele?


Reply With Quote



Bookmarks