Welcome Tom Tom

[tomtom]

[QUOTE=eliasbboy;3443074]Wow. Why are you bothering to post down here?

I explained to you that you were WRONG. She was in fact the owner of those photos. The blog was indeed hers.

To email the blog would be to email Dainty.

Thanks for proving how much of a stalker you really are by memorizing all my comments. I'm flattered.[/QUOTE]

Memorizing? You really are stupid. End of debate.

I still wasn't convinced she owned the site and to send an email informing a person somebody was stealing his photos is different than emailing her.

[eliasbboy]

[QUOTE=tomtom;3443175]Memorizing? You really are stupid. End of debate.

I still wasn't convinced she owned the site and to send an email informing a person somebody was stealing his photos is different than emailing her.[/QUOTE]

You are clearly a mentally challenged stalker.

[Lemmy]

[QUOTE=tomtom;3443046]. There you go.


Pennsylvania made the penalties worse if you refuse. Doesn't matter your argument, you are automatically assumed guilty. Refusing is all the evidence they need in pennsylvania.[/QUOTE]

Fine.....but that wasn't my argument in that thread. I argued that you should never provide evidence against yourself. The penalties for providing or not providing that evidence is a different argument. See what I mean? The debate went beyond advice for the OP but you stood your ground and couldn't or wouldn't see what I was getting at. But, of course, you were and are right. Always.

[tomtom]

[QUOTE=eliasbboy;3443234]You are clearly a mentally challenged stalker.[/QUOTE]



You're a fucking idiot who can't grasp simple logic. Calling you T@H is an insult to T@H.

[eliasbboy]

[QUOTE=tomtom;3443351]You're a fucking idiot who can't grasp simple logic. Calling you T@H is an insult to T@H.[/QUOTE]

Lololol.

You've been proven wrong 9 ways from Sunday yet you're too thick to admit it. All you had to do was stop.

That's it.

Just stop. But you're too much of a knowitall to do so.

[tomtom]

[QUOTE=eliasbboy;3443438]Lololol.

You've been proven wrong 9 ways from Sunday yet you're too thick to admit it. All you had to do was stop.

That's it.

Just stop. But you're too much of a knowitall to do so.[/QUOTE]





So if I say who somebody posted as over at SFN that's giving out personal info?

I posted a picture of Lennon and said I took it. If somebody proves different is that giving out any personal info?


If its true it was her blog then it's a fake name She gave out more info here by posting her face picture.


Saying you will email somebody to inform them there pictures are stolen isn't stalking dumbass. It happened to my sister in law who has a photography studio many times and she loves when somebody sees a watermark and sends an email

Being a mod must be quite the accomplishment in your pitiful life.

[Caster Fly]

Speaking of cross dressing posters, I find it interesting that no one addressing the dude that started this thread. :D

[eliasbboy]

Jesus Christ dude. You are missing the blog name part.

Blog names are not people's real names. If John Smith starts a blog, he doesn't call it "John Watson's Blog". Blog names are like vanity plates. They are named after authors or artists or damn near anything.

She was not posing as a man writing a blog. She was a female writing a blog that had a male name.

When I got involved you were under the impression you had uncovered someone posing as a female. I get it. That's hilarious. I would laugh my ass off if it came out Slippy or someone like that was a guy.

That's not the problem. I have proof that the blog owner and Jainty are one in the same. I didn't need to come out and say that. I told you that you were wrong about your discovery, and you needed to stop bringing it up.

People were continually mentioning and hinting at the blog name.

Did Dainty bring a lot of this on by posting pictures that could be traced? Of course. Did she deserve to have a ton of unwanted people knowing about her blog after she requested it not be posted? No.

Honestly, why so determined to keep going? Couldn't you just drop it? I had requests, alerts, and pm's all day from different people about banning you. I NEVER wanted to do that. I STILL don't. I was trying to stop the spread of Dainty's info.

For some reason you were still unsatisfied and kept at it.

I just don't get the obsession.

By the way, I released you from here hours ago.

[tomtom]

[QUOTE=eliasbboy;3443751]Jesus Christ dude. You are missing the blog name part.

Blog names are not people's real names. If John Smith starts a blog, he doesn't call it "John Watson's Blog". Blog names are like vanity plates. They are named after authors or artists or damn near anything.

She was not posing as a man writing a blog. She was a female writing a blog that had a male name.

When I got involved you were under the impression you had uncovered someone posing as a female. I get it. That's hilarious. I would laugh my ass off if it came out Slippy or someone like that was a guy.

That's not the problem. I have proof that the blog owner and Jainty are one in the same. I didn't need to come out and say that. I told you that you were wrong about your discovery, and you needed to stop bringing it up.

People were continually mentioning and hinting at the blog name.

Did Dainty bring a lot of this on by posting pictures that could be traced? Of course. Did she deserve to have a ton of unwanted people knowing about her blog after she requested it not be posted? No.

Honestly, why so determined to keep going? Couldn't you just drop it? I had requests, alerts, and pm's all day from different people about banning you. I NEVER wanted to do that. I STILL don't. I was trying to stop the spread of Dainty's info.

For some reason you were still unsatisfied and kept at it.

I just don't get the obsession.

By the way, I released you from here hours ago.[/QUOTE]




For the last time I do understand hence me saying that by posting the blog name was no more giving personal info than by saying what name somebody posts under over at SFN.





Oh please oh boring one, ramble on about monikers some more.

[eliasbboy]

[QUOTE=tomtom;3444007]For the last time I do understand hence me saying that by posting the blog name was no more giving personal info than by saying what name somebody posts under over at SFN.


Oh please oh boring one, ramble on about monikers some more.[/QUOTE]


The fact you see no difference explains it all.

There is nothing more sad than a stupid man that thinks he's smart.

[Dawg]

Tom Tom, you know I like you bro and we are Efriends right? Do me a favor ok? Drop it. It's over, lets move on. I cannot allow anyone to disrespect my staff. So before it gets out of hand lets drop it and move on. Thank you.

[Mlaw]

BTW

It's plagiarized, I know it's a big word, but spelling counts when you call people stupid, and you can't plagiarize a photo

[FlaFlaFlunkie]

[QUOTE=tomtom;3442832]My spelling isn't perfect. I should really use the spellcheck more often.[/QUOTE]Yes. Especially when you're attempting to slam someone for not knowing a "big word." :jj:

[tomtom]

[QUOTE=Mlaw;3444632]BTW

It's plagiarized, I know it's a big word, but spelling counts when you call people stupid, and you can't plagiarize a photo[/QUOTE]
I acknowledged the misspell. You should talk figuring you don't know the difference between your and you're. Also how many times do you have to be corrected that it's "should've" not "should of". That isn't misspelling words that's stupidity.

Also as for the photo:

pla·gia·rism [pley-juh-riz-uhm, -jee-uh-riz-] Show IPA
noun
1.
an act or instance of using or closely imitating the language*and thoughts of another author without authorization and the representation of that author's work as one's own, as by not crediting the original author: It is said that he plagiarized Thoreau's plagiarism of a line*written by Montaigne. Synonyms: appropriation, infringement, piracy, counterfeiting; theft, borrowing, cribbing, passing off.
2.
a piece of writing or other work reflecting such unauthorized use or imitation: “These two manuscripts are clearly plagiarisms,” the editor said, tossing them angrily on the floor.



A piece of writing or other work.

God you're as annoying as you are fat. No wonder you're a failure at law.

[Caster Fly]

[QUOTE=Mlaw;3444632]BTW

It's plagiarized, I know it's a big word, but spelling counts when you call people stupid, and you can't plagiarize a photo[/QUOTE]

Wow, do you ever get anything right?

[Dainty Jainty]

Tomtom, admit that you were WRONG. 100% MISTAKEN. WRONG. You are not only obnoxious and stubborn, you are painfully STUPID!

[Dainty Jainty]

[QUOTE=Dawg;3444058]Tom Tom, you know I like you bro and we are Efriends right? Do me a favor ok? Drop it. It's over, lets move on. I cannot allow anyone to disrespect my staff. So before it gets out of hand lets drop it and move on. Thank you.[/QUOTE]



He got to this place initially because he was so obstinate, he could NOT drop it! I have no idea why you would like him. If he did the same to you, would you just have him tossed in the clink for 12 hours or would you ban him?

[Caster Fly]

[QUOTE=Dainty Jainty;3448102]He got to this place initially because he was so obstinate, he could NOT drop it! I have no idea why you would like him. If he did the same to you, would you just have him tossed in the clink for 12 hours or would you ban him?[/QUOTE]

Hiya fella, did you think Dawg was asking Tom to drop it so you can walk in and take a free shot?

[BeetTheBoxer]

[QUOTE=eliasbboy;3443234]You are clearly a mentally challenged stalker.[/QUOTE]

truer words never spoken. amen

[BeetTheBoxer]

[QUOTE=Dainty Jainty;3448084]Tomtom, admit that you were WRONG. 100% MISTAKEN. WRONG. You are not only obnoxious and stubborn, you are painfully STUPID![/QUOTE]

ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha