Page 3 of 14 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 264
  1. #41
    Maverick
    killallposers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Alone
    Posts
    1,854
    now that DADT was removed, they have to find a place for all the dikes joining.
    "If my wife started going to a bereavement counselor, I'd throw her out." Howard referring to Nancy's grieving of Timmy the cat.

  2. #42
    DS Supporter
    Kamie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Jersey
    Posts
    3,156
    Quote Originally Posted by nicksgt View Post
    women in combat

    howard "fought in Vietnam"

    see the connection
    Thank you! I was trying to find a way to tie it to HS and came up blank. Remember that he collected gook ears and wore them on a necklace? True story.

  3. #43
    Quote Originally Posted by Dead Air Dave View Post
    Why in the hell are threads like this allowed in this forum? Ugh.
    They're made by bitter fucks who can't get over the election.

    Some of us just wanna talk about what a loathsome piece of shit the Queen of Casa De La Chimney is but we get cockblocked (forum spammed) repeatedly by these crybaby fuckfaces and whiny faggots who just can't let it go and get over it.....

  4. #44
    DS Supporter
    Kamie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Jersey
    Posts
    3,156
    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck Kongo View Post
    They're made by bitter fucks who can't get over the election.

    Some of us just wanna talk about what a loathsome piece of shit the Queen of Casa De La Chimney is but we get cockblocked (forum spammed) repeatedly by these crybaby fuckfaces and whiny faggots who just can't let it go and get over it.....
    You seem to be the only bitter one. We are simply having a high-falutin' discourse about the military. The election is over, and I'm just sitting back with my stogie and monocle, counting all my money.

  5. #45
    DS Supporter
    itpdude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    5,317
    There is something fundamentally wrong with a nation that makes it a priority to get women into combat, therefore expanding its base of humans that can be used as cannon-fodder, rather than making it a priority to act less aggressively as a nation.

    Couple hundred thousand civilians dead in Iraq on our little adventure there? No problemo. Not having gays being able to openly serve the Imperial States of American? THAT'S the problem.

    The US is a fucked up country when these are our priorities.
    Have derision, will travel

  6. #46
    1/2 grumpkin, 1/4 snark. Chimney Portions's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    18,998
    Quote Originally Posted by itpdude View Post
    There is something fundamentally wrong with a nation that makes it a priority to get women into combat, therefore expanding its base of humans that can be used as cannon-fodder, rather than making it a priority to act less aggressively as a nation.

    Couple hundred thousand civilians dead in Iraq on our little adventure there? No problemo. Not having gays being able to openly serve the Imperial States of American? THAT'S the problem.

    The US is a fucked up country when these are our priorities.
    Exactly!
    My name is Cheryl and I'm your daughter.

  7. #47
    DS Supporter
    fletchman71's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    3,052
    Quote Originally Posted by Wangold View Post
    GI Jane?!!! Why don't they make a more believable movie about a brotha trying to join an all white country club. Call it........................................"GI don't think so."
    HA! What ever happend to good ol' Colt Forty Fineberg? He was actually pretty funny.

  8. #48
    You know, if women want to join, if gays want to join; fine.
    But NO exceptions.

  9. #49
    So it turns out all the generals had to vote on this and it was unanimous.

    Generals are almost always conservatives.

    Sorta throws that whole 'left wing conspiracy' shit out the window, eh?

  10. #50
    Maverick

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    4,901
    Quote Originally Posted by Dead Air Dave View Post
    So it turns out all the generals had to vote on this and it was unanimous.

    Generals are almost always conservatives.

    Sorta throws that whole 'left wing conspiracy' shit out the window, eh?
    lying lamestream media believing lefterest socialistic demrat
    sb[SIGPIC]

  11. #51
    Quote Originally Posted by Dead Air Dave View Post

    Generals are almost always conservatives.
    And you can prove this how?

  12. #52
    Maverick

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    4,901
    if they can do the job, i'm fine with it.

    how about putting them at our borders
    Last edited by racerx; 01-23-2013 at 05:00 PM.
    sb[SIGPIC]

  13. #53
    Does this mean we have more wars on the horizon and are running out of able-bodied males?

  14. #54
    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck Kongo View Post
    So all of you whining crybbabies in this bitter rightwingnut circle jerk of a thread who believe this are actually suggesting the armed forces of the Unites States are teeming with out of control rapists and sexual predators?

    Wow. I though you fucks were the ones who loved the troops, never met a war you didn't like, and couldn't wait to play with their lives the way you played with your fucking G.I. Joes when you were a bunch of snot-nosed little brats.

    Wow.....how disparaging of our armed forces....

    Why do you people hate the troops? Why do you hate America?
    no. but chicks do make claims that aren't true in the military to get out of shit, or remove people that would stand in their way. and, they fuck their way to the top.

    as for it working in isreal...their men didn't turn into emo faggots (well, except for howard and their other americanized counterparts), and aren't afraid to keep women in check like 'muricans.

  15. #55
    DS Supporter
    Obi Drunkenobe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    somewhere in time
    Posts
    7,542
    They would still have to go through the same training regimen as the men. I say if she can make it through the training let her serve on the front line.

  16. #56
    Quote Originally Posted by rilagent View Post
    And you can prove this how?
    'Global role of military in politics'

    Stanford Univ, 2004, RH, et al

    'From this survey it is clear that the US military have been more closely associated with the Republican than the Democratic Party'

  17. #57
    Quote Originally Posted by Obi Drunkenobe View Post
    They would still have to go through the same training regimen as the men. I say if she can make it through the training let her serve on the front line.
    no, they don't. women have different standards in the military than men.

  18. #58
    Quote Originally Posted by Obi Drunkenobe View Post
    They would still have to go through the same training regimen as the men. I say if she can make it through the training let her serve on the front line.

    They don't go through the same training as the men they serve with now. Their packs are lighter. Their physical fitness benchmarks are less. They get to drop out of forced marches at 5 miles. But I say let Obama put them up there anyway, they want to wear the uniform and gather the rank let them face the danger.

  19. #59
    Quote Originally Posted by Dead Air Dave View Post
    'Global role of military in politics'

    Stanford Univ, 2004, RH, et al

    'From this survey it is clear that the US military have been more closely associated with the Republican than the Democratic Party'
    You need to show me a little more then that et al. Where does it say that the Generals are politically conservative?

    Besides, the Generals can all be Luddites or murdering socialists who may vote YEA on this but this is Obama's doing. I'm not sure why Obama wants a lot of dead women on his hands but as Commander in Chief it's his call.

  20. #60
    DS Supporter
    Obi Drunkenobe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    somewhere in time
    Posts
    7,542
    Quote Originally Posted by AngryWhite View Post
    no, they don't. women have different standards in the military than men.
    I dont think they are going to lower the standards so a woman can become a paratrooper, green beret ect. That would put all of their lives in danger if there was someone there that couldn't pull their weight. I could be wrong but that seems to make the most sense.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •