Republicans lose, try to change the rule like losers.

[Bosch76]

Madison - The head of the Republican National Committee believes Wisconsin and other battleground states should change the way they allocate their Electoral College votes, but he said he is not inserting himself into how states decide to proceed.
"It's not my decision that can come from the RNC, that's for sure," said Reince Priebus, the RNC's chairman.
Gov. Scott Walker recently said he was intrigued by the notion of Wisconsin divvying up its electoral votes by congressional district, but that he had not made up his mind on whether to back the idea. If such a system had been in place in November, President Barack Obama and Republican Mitt Romney would have evenly split Wisconsin's 10 electoral votes, rather than having all of them go to Obama.
As Republicans have mulled over Romney's defeat, some have promoted the idea of having states such as Wisconsin, Michigan and Ohio give two electoral votes each to the statewide winner and dole out the rest to the winner of each congressional district.
Pennsylvania lawmakers failed to pass such a plan in 2011, but a GOP leader there is now pursuing a variation on the theme that would allocate the electoral votes in a way that was proportional to the number of ballots cast for each candidate.

[I invented that]

i thought you were going to mention al gore's push to eliminate the electoral college.

[HeinousMark]

They oughta just do some of that down-home Gramm-Style redistricting... It fucked changed Texas purty good....

[I invented that]

They oughta just do some of that down-home Gramm-Style redistricting... It fucked changed Texas purty good....

I didn't know republicans where only party using redistricting for an advantage. Thanks for the info.

[MatthewT]

[Bosch76]

I'm not the one with a homosexual preacher as my avatar.

[BeetTheBoxer]

anything to keep the moozlim dogs out of office

[BeetTheBoxer]

I like what FLA did with their elections too. Discourage the libitards

[MatthewT]

I'm not the one with a homosexual preacher as my avatar.

who are you babbling about?

[Bosch76]

who are you babbling about?

This guy is the leader of the largest homosexual religious sect in America.

[MatthewT]

yeah. that's Rick Warren.

i'm MatthewT

can you tell the difference now?

[MatthewT]

last time i checked, rick warren's church was not even gay-friendly, much less gay-exclusive

you really are lost dude

[MatthewT]

oh, and probably gay

[Bosch76]

This guy is the leader of the largest homosexual religious sect in America.

This doesn't scream flaming homo to you?

[MatthewT]

rick warren is going to heaven by the grace of God; so am i

you're going to where again? because why again?

[Bosch76]

rick warren is going to heaven by the grace of God; so am i

you're going to where again? because why again?

You hate god's creatures and have failed to live by the teachings of jesus. If there is a hell, you are going my friend.

[Bosch76]

rick warren is going to heaven by the grace of God; so am i

you're going to where again? because why again?

Rick Warren is a thief using gods name to enrich himself. If there is a line into hell, he is at the front.

[BeetTheBoxer]

why are libtards so intolerant?
disgusting.

[MatthewT]

You hate god's creatures and have failed to live by the teachings of jesus. If there is a hell, you are going my friend.

so, in your mind, earthly performance is rewarded with entry into heaven

[MatthewT]

Rick Warren is a thief using gods name to enrich himself. If there is a line into hell, he is at the front.

doesn't he give away like 96% of his income? that's a pretty high percentage. and you don't like that he keeps 4%? that seems like less than the percentage of your income that you keep.

assuming you have income

assuming you have a job

assuming you're not a welfare teat sucking homosexual on disability, or some shit like that. i mean, who knows, right? you're just here to sling shit around, not actually talk to real people.