Go back and read your own post. My words don't make sense if you already forgot what you quoted from Avery and claimed I missed.
Also, if anyone wants to see whether Avery ripped me a new asshole, here is the link to that thread:
http://www.dawgsaloon.com/showthread...very+economics
Guess I'm not on ignore anymore.![]()
My dick still has chaffe marks.
Not possible. Our entire military would never turn against us. It would be a civil war. Or a failed coup d'état from the part of the military that tried to take over a part of the country. You'd never see the military being able to take over the country without devastating civilization.
If somehow someone convinced all of the Marines to take over the country then the Army and Navy and National Guard would fight against them. It would be unrealistic for the entire military to be able to overthrow our country. There are simply too many people in the military that would not participate in the uprising. There would be more resistance than mutiny.
Our entire army could not win Vietnam nor Afghanistan with the most sophisticated weaponry and endless parades of trained soldiers fighting a united front. Our own military in a civil war? It would be Armageddon. Insanity.
The only way to take over the country would be to destroy the entire infrastructure. Nuclear war or heavy bombardment. That's not viable. You destroy the country and you are left with nothing to keep after the war. Cut off your nose to spite your face. Pyrrhic victory. You keep a major city like NY or LA hostage with the military and you'll kill the economy and then those cities are useless.
We are naturally protected from the military because of our infrastructure. That's why the Cold War never escalted into Nuclear War. We have too much invested in modern life. There won't be an uprising that leaves the country intact. Nuclear War or World War III will end all life on the planet. You familiar with the Cold War concept of MAD? We have that now with a military uprising. It would ruin our entire country.
Gun rights have nothing to do with fighting off some imaginary military takeover. Our military is all volunteer. They'd be rising against themselves essentially. Gun rights are for personal protection. When the police aren't there. When you need to stop a home intruder or stop someone from opening fire in a crowded mall. Guns are the best protection against violence criminals. That's what guns are most useful for now in terms of protection and weaponry.
And it's not just violent criminals with guns that you need protection from. You don't need a gun to kill someone. A rapist doesn't need a gun. He doesn't even need a weapon sometimes. His physical size might be enough. But a woman with a gun can equalize or overcome the situation with the stopping power of a concealed pistol. A gun can prevent someone from breaking into your house who has a knife or may be very strong or tall who can overpower you.
There is no threat from the military. We don't need guns for them. Gun rights have nothing to do with keeping us protected from the government overthrowing us because the military is "us". It's a volunteer army were citizens sign up for service. But there are threats from gang violence. Or rapists. Or home invaders. That you could protect yourself against should you want to. And the best protection is a concealed firearm with decent stopping power.

To be honest all the 'limeys' I know cannot stand piers morgan. He was sacked from his last job over here for printing pictures of british soldiers beating up iraqi prisoners which turned out to be fake when he ran the daily mirror a british tabloid . The printing of those pics was directly linked to a riot over in iraq that lead to the death of injury of a number of british soldiers and iraqi civilians. His name was mud even before that and was seen as a joke because of jeremy clarkson of top gear beating him up for printing pictures of clarkson with his tongue down some womans throat who wasn't his wife.
Clarkson is oddly the BBC's golden boy (the BBC is full of left wing liberal hippies and clarkson is normally the kind of green bashing homo hater,white male loudmouth they despise ) because of the amount of money he makes them and the international success of top gear ,one of the few TV shows left that the BBC can be proud of. So basically he can walk on water, not least because he and his wife are patrons of 'help for heroes' a charity that helps wounded war vets . You don't fuck with clarkson when he has the public and the government run media broadcasting service behind him , and then you have the whole phone hacking thing ,so piers morgan ran with his tail between his legs over to the states... the filthy commie cunt.
No one wants him back, and to be honest as a brit I kind of see the pro gun lobbys point to a good extent ,when it comes to Britain .There is a massive loss of public confidence in the police for a variety of reasons over here and there are things morgan seriously wouldn't want brought up concerning britains criminal justice system which I would love to ask him about . There is a chap called peter hitchens ,a British newspaper columnist who would tear morgan apart concerning the arguments morgan makes about britains gun laws and crime .
I notice also morgans deflection when jones kept mentioning psychotrophic medications .... They problem I see there is ,the mental institutions have closed in both the US and the UK to a huge degree, for reasons of cost and because they were seen as inhumane (and to a good extent they were not perfect solutions either ) instead psychiatry seems to consist instead of doping people with all sorts of mental sickness with chemicals that mess with brain chemicals, after a short chat about the patients problems. They are attempting to crudely put people into diagnostic groups and not treating them as individuals enough and unfortunately a minority fall through the cracks and use guns, knives, swords , their fists, trains to slaughter often times random people. I also think the relationship between drugs companies and psychiatry could be seen as suspicious almost sinister . Lots of money in it, from doping people up for the rest of their lives .
They are doling out these pills and then expecting the patients and their families to deal with an unpredictable result in their homes behind closed doors. To me in years to come people will look back on this era and the money grabbing drugs companies will be seen in the same light as the fuckers who took out parts of the brains in lunatics ,blindly without nearly enough knowledge of the brain and mind ,then claiming the poor victims were 'cured'.If you count being 'cured' as being a drooling cabbage .
I've seen some dumb motherfuckers on the internets but ving might take the cake.
After the appearance on CNN’s Piers Morgan, Alex Jones and Infowars video producer Rob Dew noticed they were being followed, watched and approached by possibly undercover agents claiming to be fans.
Alex was promised three segments on Morgan’s show; however, his producers apparently cancelled the last segment after Jones continued bashing Morgan with unscripted truths and facts.
What are you talking about? Drones are both automatic and manual already.
You can program a drone to fly over a specific building and bomb it. Nothing needed more than coordinate mapping and a few button presses. Once the drone has its orders it bombs the building and flies back to base and lands and gets refueled. Drones also automatically patrol areas and constantly film things and then the government archives the recordings. Satellites have been doing this for decades trying to find nuclear missile facilities or bomb making factories. Lots of the Iraq WMD intelligence was outdated satellite imagery of Saddam's former bomb making factories that had been dismantled years after the photos were taken.
Drones need pilots and a human presence when they are being used to bomb a person. Like a terrorist who is high up in some Jihadist organization. You need positive visual confirmation of the target. So the drone flies overhead and a person looks at the computer monitor and confirms that the person on the ground is a major terrorist asset. Then the drone is told to drop a bomb. Dead terrorist. Until the drones have the most sophisticated facial recognition software on the planet then we'll need human pilots for our targeted assassinations for years to come.
Bookmarks