Natalie Maines singing Pink Floyd's Mother -- BOTH versions

[ElRexican]

Produced Version:
http://www.npr.org/blogs/therecord/2...-after-tragedy

Live Version in HSS studio:

[yippeekyaa]

Yup, Fred fucked it up by playing too fast and Natilie fucked it up by not telling fred to show down.

[itpdude]

Yup, Fred fucked it up by playing too fast and Natilie fucked it up by not telling fred to show down.

Man, it pains me, gives me pain dammit!!!!!, to say this but I enjoyed it. The tempo, the singing, the playing. Everything.

And I dislike that song generally.

[Murphy]

Man, it pains me, gives me pain dammit!!!!!, to say this but I enjoyed it. The tempo, the singing, the playing. Everything.

And I dislike that song generally.

Yeah, I dug it after the first verse. I'm not sure if it was the added instruments muting more of her voice or if it was her singing stronger that was more appealing, but it was a vast improvement over the in-studio performance.

[ilovebacon]

[ElRexican]

oh my.. I totally don't recall that....

that was great though!

[Ruffypup]

Natalie should have brought her own accoustic guitar in and sing Landslide.

[Robert Higgins]

And now this is how the song is supposed to sound.



Like Pete Townshend said "it's the singer, not the song."

[somedude61]

Her rendition didn't bring anything new to the song. It was pretty average and not very enjoyable.

[IamPigMan]

Her rendition didn't bring anything new to the song. It was pretty average and not very enjoyable.

This. The interview with her was even more painful.

[Mike in Houston]

That's a worse combover than my dad.

[Keyser Soze]

That's a worse combover than my dad.

I really despise that woman.
She actually believes that the First Amendment allows her to speak without consequences.

She and Howard are profoundly ignorant of what the First Amendment actually is and means.
The First Amendment only allows her to speak without Government interference in her speech.
It does NOT protect her from the reaction of those who find her speech to be blatantly and callously offensive.

She's a typical libtard.
She professes a right for herself but doesn't acknowledge the rights of those who find her conduct reprehensible.


She used to be somewhat attractive.
OOFah! has that woman let herself go.
She now looks like a an old bagged out version of Lindsay Lohan's old dyke girlfriend.
Not even a pretense of femininity.

[FlaFlaFlunkie]

I really despise that woman.
She actually believes that the First Amendment allows her to speak without consequences.

She and Howard are profoundly ignorant of what the First Amendment actually is and means.
The First Amendment only allows her to speak without Government interference in her speech.
It does NOT protect her from the reaction of those who find her speech to be blatantly and callously offensive.

What are you talking about? She was sued by one of the fathers of the victims and he lost.

[Keyser Soze]

What are you talking about? She was sued by one of the fathers of the victims and he lost.

I was speaking about what she said about President Bush.

It was shameful and she deserved every bit of shit she received for it.

[Lurkisome]

It's shameful to state that you are ashamed to be from the same state as the president? She deserved the multiple death threats? You're too sensitive.

[BOXofROX]

I really despise that woman.
She actually believes that the First Amendment allows her to speak without consequences.

She and Howard are profoundly ignorant of what the First Amendment actually is and means.
The First Amendment only allows her to speak without Government interference in her speech.
It does NOT protect her from the reaction of those who find her speech to be blatantly and callously offensive.

She's a typical libtard.
She professes a right for herself but doesn't acknowledge the rights of those who find her conduct reprehensible.


She used to be somewhat attractive.
OOFah! has that woman let herself go.
She now looks like a an old bagged out version of Lindsay Lohan's old dyke girlfriend.
Not even a pretense of femininity.

i disagree...i kinda dig her

[hollywoodrose]

I really despise that woman.
She actually believes that the First Amendment allows her to speak without consequences.

She and Howard are profoundly ignorant of what the First Amendment actually is and means.
The First Amendment only allows her to speak without Government interference in her speech.
It does NOT protect her from the reaction of those who find her speech to be blatantly and callously offensive.

She's a typical libtard.
She professes a right for herself but doesn't acknowledge the rights of those who find her conduct reprehensible.


She used to be somewhat attractive.
OOFah! has that woman let herself go.
She now looks like a an old bagged out version of Lindsay Lohan's old dyke girlfriend.
Not even a pretense of femininity.

It depends on what the "consequences" are.


"I may not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." You should give this quote some serious thought.


A lot of people think freedom is just whatever makes them feel safe. For people who only want security, real freedom is challenging, uncomfortable and threatening. It's not for everyone. I think there's a group of people out there now who confuse "our country" with "our government", which is sad because that's the point when you lose.


The government is just a group of public servants hired to do a job - a job that is prone to corruption and needs to be monitored like a child molester at a day care center, with criminality being met with the most severe prosecution. It's as simple as that. The "country" is we the people and the constitution. If you think Natalie questioning the government (which has become so corrupt that it hardly bothers to lie anymore since it assumes people are too dumb or scared to face the truth) is unpatriotic then you should despise yourself, not her, because you let a bunch of greedy, corrupt half-wits scare you into giving up your rights and the power to think for yourself. Either that or gtfo.

[Sacredcow]

I really despise that woman.
She actually believes that the First Amendment allows her to speak without consequences.

She and Howard are profoundly ignorant of what the First Amendment actually is and means.
The First Amendment only allows her to speak without Government interference in her speech.
It does NOT protect her from the reaction of those who find her speech to be blatantly and callously offensive.

She's a typical libtard.
She professes a right for herself but doesn't acknowledge the rights of those who find her conduct reprehensible.


She used to be somewhat attractive.
OOFah! has that woman let herself go.
She now looks like a an old bagged out version of Lindsay Lohan's old dyke girlfriend.
Not even a pretense of femininity.

You are what's wrong with America. You value free speech then get pissed off when someone uses it. She was very tame IMO. If everyone thought like you we wouldn't have people like MLK, Bradley manning Julian assange etc. thank god we have people with strong opinions. We would already be living in 1984 if you had your way.

[HS Cult Leader]

That's a worse combover than my dad.

[whatsit]