then how will hicks ever get to see a rainbow
![]()
its the tail wagging the dog.
If they ban 30 round clips, everyone will buy 25 rd clips
if they ban 25 rd clips, everyone will buy 20rd clips
if they ban 20 rd clips, everyone will buy TWO 15 rd clips.
two 15rd clips are probably easier to carry than one 30rd clip.
i blame the safety scissor industry. These crazy kids should have killed themselves long ago.
Seriously though, its bad parenting, most people focus too much on making money and not enough on raising good kids (see Wiggy).
Add to this the 'reality star' culture we live in where i can name both shooters at combine, but not one victim.
No one should know this dudes name, he should be "John Doe 3" or "John Doe 12"
But ulitmately is the parents fault, and her foolish pride not wanted to commit her son sooner.
Semi-automatic weapons are much, much more accurate that fully automatic weapons.
as long as Obama doesn't outlaw my Gatling Gun.
it doesn't qualify as an assault weapon: it's a swiss cheese machine.
Last edited by newcastlefan; 12-19-2012 at 02:12 PM.
ok, who writes "goo goo at a at a, fukin jew heeb"?
"fuckyoubigot i dont like you're sig" "repeated annoying comments"
The Lord is not my Shepherd for I am not a sheep.

Yes I would. I have the right to own an assault rifle, which is already a dumbed down version of a machine gun (less ammo, not fully auto, etc). Banning them using the ct shooting is absurd since an assault weapons ban would do absolutely nothing to lower the gun violence numbers of this country. By far, the number of gun crimes committed are through hand guns, specifically illegal handguns. Banning assault weapons is just something to do because its easy and would I've the appearance of doing something. Even though the number of 'other guns" incidents in this country is less than the number of knife-related incidents and this jner includes shotguns and hunting rifles, which means the assault rifles are even less of an issue.
that being said, I am for closing the gun show loophole...
... But only if setting is done about illegal handguns.
The above is strictly my humble opinion.
The Bushmaster has been banned for hunting deer .. because it's not powerful enough and the wounded animal could suffer. It's basically a glorified semi-automatic pistol. But because it looks scary and contains the scary word "assault," idiot, uneducated gun grabbers lose their fucking minds.
The Pandora thing is huge.
Unless, like you say, we want to submit to door-to-door checks by the authorities, searching everywhere in our homes, discovering who-knows-what in the process (how many drug arrests would there be in such a situation? If it's ATF, I know guys who would have trouble explaining their distillery equipment), will we get rid of the guns or even just high capacity magazines, etc.
Unless we want to REALLY trample on privacy rights, what is REALLY going to change? And even then, there are lots of folks who have encased, or are at least prepared to encase, any potentially illegal firearms in plastic and then PVC and bury them somewhere.
The gun-control angle is window-dressing but, as Americans have shown before, they will be convinced that all is well because "something just had to be done."
Whether it is effective or not or encroaches on civil-liberties or not.
Have derision, will travel

I don't think any private citizen should be legally able to own a machine gun.
But I do support people owning submachine guns and assault rifles.
I do think we need to invest a lot more effort into mental illness and get the people that might use assault rifles and submachine guns for murderous use some help before they snap.
And I think we need to quit blaming media and videogames for making kids snap - that is just bullshit.

Bookmarks