Let's do this!
this idea may have been done at one point throughout human existence, but no one really knows for sure.
View Poll Results: Beatles V Stones
- Voters
- 19. You may not vote on this poll
Results 1 to 20 of 36
Thread: Beatles vs Stones
-
11-30-2012, 01:27 AM #1high as a kite
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 13,117
Beatles vs Stones
Originally Posted by Isobel
-
11-30-2012, 01:29 AM #2high as a kite
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 13,117
Please note that this is a public poll.
AKA feelings can and will be hurt. Originally Posted by Isobel
-
11-30-2012, 04:59 AM #3Loud Mouth Drunk
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Posts
- 202
The Rolling Stones are amazing, but the Beatles collection of music is just so varied and different. The Stones, not so much, they're pretty much a straight forward blues/rock band. And according to my ITunes, I only own 57 Stones songs. The Beatles.... 135
-
11-30-2012, 05:51 AM #4Maverick
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Posts
- 5,354
...the beatles....all day and all night.You're a fake wearer sucker whose gold got busted.Cheaper than a hot dog with no mustard.You tried to steal my fresh and you got cold busted.Because your crew's all soft and I'm disgusted.
-
11-30-2012, 05:52 AM #5Bar Fly
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Posts
- 657
Apples and oranges. I will say I like them both equally for different reasons and what they bring. If I'm listening to the Beatles, I think this is great. Same when i Hear the Stones. Every time I hear Loving Cup I know that is as good as a song can get to me. Have to listen to it twice usually. They both have songs that work that way for me
-
11-30-2012, 07:36 AM #6⠀⠀⠀⠀
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- Hell
- Posts
- 17,975
Stones are great, Beatles are better. Beatles were obviously a lot more diverse, but honestly when they wanted to play rock/blues, I think they could easily hold their own against the Stones. IMHO. THe Beatles spent so many years in the studio, isolated from each other, but if you listen to the old stuff, they were an extremely tight band, and Let It Be confirmed that they still were, except for wanting to kill each other.
Originally Posted by GHP
It's the millennium. It's OK to hate the niggers again
Originally Posted by MatthewT
-
11-30-2012, 10:08 AM #7Dawg Saloon Staff
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Posts
- 25,669
I never really got into the Stones.
-
11-30-2012, 10:09 AM #8Dawg Saloon Staff
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Posts
- 25,669
Says the fag who thinks this is their best song Originally Posted by low selfestitle
I never really got into the Stones.
-
11-30-2012, 10:20 AM #9Maverick
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 5,927
the stones were on mtv everyday when i was a kid
-
12-01-2012, 01:07 AM #10DS Supporter
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Location
- America's Hometown
- Posts
- 8,804
I wonder if the Beatles didn't break up/die if they would have done the douchey 80s thing too. Paul did the songs with Michael Jackson. I think John would have gotten really eccentric and Yoko would have turned him into a huge twat. Or he would have kicked her to the curb and grew his balls back. We'll never know.
Originally Posted by Nikkerz
-
12-02-2012, 05:59 AM #11DS Supporter
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Posts
- 1,478
Even Wings were better than Stones.....
-
12-02-2012, 06:09 AM #12pot haid
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Posts
- 17,487
the age old question.
couldn't answer it in the 70s, can't answer it now.
-
12-02-2012, 06:09 AM #13pot haid
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Posts
- 17,487
WHAT? Originally Posted by PiggyMohammad
Even Wings were better than Stones.....
no seriously WHAT?
-
12-02-2012, 06:14 AM #14DS Supporter
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Posts
- 1,478
Thats my honest opinion. Never liked the Stones. Hey, at least I still think they are better than Ringo! Originally Posted by sstressed
But still: John Lennon>George Harrison>Wings>Rolling Stones>Ringo imho....Last edited by PiggyMohammad; 12-02-2012 at 06:18 AM.
-
12-02-2012, 06:21 AM #15Maverick
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 5,927
i cant stand the yea yea yeas and i dont trip
i dont get the beatles at allLast edited by christ cracker; 12-02-2012 at 06:25 AM.
-
12-02-2012, 07:19 AM #16⠀⠀⠀⠀
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- Hell
- Posts
- 17,975
Originally Posted by PiggyMohammad
Even Wings were better than Stones.....
[video=youtube;r7OTtW-XPBk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7OTtW-XPBk[/video
Originally Posted by GHP
It's the millennium. It's OK to hate the niggers again Originally Posted by MatthewT
-
12-02-2012, 07:26 AM #17Dawg Lover
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Posts
- 30,623
Originally Posted by PiggyMohammad
Even Wings were better than Stones.....
Nemo's cock is always implied.
Originally Posted by Dominic GPS
-
12-04-2012, 07:22 PM #18DS Supporter
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Posts
- 3,024
Stones. But to each their own.
-
12-04-2012, 07:45 PM #19Jeannie needs a shooter
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Posts
- 1,108
The Beatles grew from a simple band to complex songs, thoughts and rhythms. I have to go with them over the Stones. When I am in a party mood, I do love to bring out the Stones, though. It's a hard choice.
Team Anfkid all the way!
-
12-05-2012, 01:32 AM #20high as a kite
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 13,117
If I were to be constantly a rock and roller, my choice would obviously be the Stones.
If I wanted to gain introspection then it would be The Beatles. Originally Posted by Isobel
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks