Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1

    GOP opposition to Rice on Libya attack begins to crack

    The subtle shift in GOP tenor on Rice could be the result of internal grumblings on how far to take party opposition. Democrats picked up extra seats in the election to maintain their narrow majority, making it that much harder for the remaining 45 Republicans to block the president's nominees.


    One senior GOP Senate aide said Sunday that Republicans hadn't united against Rice and were not convinced that she was worth going after.

    GOP opposition to Rice on Libya attack begins to crack; McCain could be persuaded to back her

    and cunts are still conviced this is about dead americans in benghazi
    politics at work

  2. #2
    http://www.politicususa.com/john-mcc...itch-hunt.html

    from the comments: The point I love is McCain keeps saying Dr. Susan Rice isn’t intelligent enough to be SOS. Well we all know of all the degrees she has from, for example Oxford. While McCain the “intelligence” graduated from West Point. A college you are APPOINTED TO 494th in a class of 499.

  3. #3
    I don't think Obama will nominate Rice at this point. He doesn't want her getting grilled under oath. He's in a weird place now where it will look bad if he doesn't nominate her, but we shall see.

    Also, stop blocking people. It's weak.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by shitcunt View Post
    Also, stop blocking people. It's weak.
    i block people who add nothing to the discussion or only rely on personal attacks, not interested. love having you around, at least you throw some arguments around.

  5. #5
    ⠀⠀⠀⠀ HeinousMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hell
    Posts
    17,237
    Quote Originally Posted by InstigatinMofo View Post
    i block people who add nothing to the discussion or only rely on personal attacks, not interested. love having you around, at least you throw some arguments around.
    I-Mo, you just don't understand the etiquette of right-wing debate. Here, practice by countering this astute, well-reasoned, and erudite Conservative Neo-Tea-Party talking-point:

    Quote Originally Posted by GHP View Post
    It's the millennium. It's OK to hate the niggers again
    Quote Originally Posted by MatthewT View Post
    Hitler was a liberal; National Socialist Party

  6. #6
    DS Supporter
    Obi Drunkenobe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    somewhere in time
    Posts
    7,542
    Quote Originally Posted by shitcunt View Post
    I don't think Obama will nominate Rice at this point. He doesn't want her getting grilled under oath. He's in a weird place now where it will look bad if he doesn't nominate her, but we shall see.

    Also, stop blocking people. It's weak.
    He will nominate Rice just to give the middle finger to the GOP.

  7. #7
    ⠀⠀⠀⠀ HeinousMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hell
    Posts
    17,237
    Quote Originally Posted by Obi Drunkenobe View Post
    He will nominate Rice just to give the middle finger to the GOP.
    THIS!

    Frankly I don't give a fuck if Rice is the Second Coming of Jesus and fully, unequivocally exonerated, I'd rather see this country burned to the ground and sent to Hell than to let Libtards control anything.
    Quote Originally Posted by GHP View Post
    It's the millennium. It's OK to hate the niggers again
    Quote Originally Posted by MatthewT View Post
    Hitler was a liberal; National Socialist Party

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Obi Drunkenobe View Post
    He will nominate Rice just to give the middle finger to the GOP.
    why give them anything anyways, he knows they wont give anything back afterwards

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by HeinousMark View Post
    I-Mo, you just don't understand the etiquette of right-wing debate. Here, practice by countering this astute, well-reasoned, and erudite Conservative Neo-Tea-Party talking-point:

    lol

    im still trying to figure out how to respond to this, used to see it in every post of mine... one of their strongest talking points i guess



    i guess im just an asshole trying to silence "dissenting views"
    Last edited by InstigatinMofo; 11-25-2012 at 08:33 PM.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by InstigatinMofo View Post
    i block people who add nothing to the discussion or only rely on personal attacks, not interested. love having you around, at least you throw some arguments around.
    i blame dawg more than you. it's a shitty feature.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •