I refuse to allow the Senate to be used as a venue for baseless partisan attacks

[SiriusDawg]

Looks like you enjoy plenty of biased news. I've seen the Daily Show a few times. He plays a video clip and then makes a funny face. Pretty boring.

If you have seen it a few times, why are you commenting on it?

Don't you tell liberals to stop bashing Fox unless you watch it?

[shitcunt]

and you get them from....?? that was the point you big dummy
see what we deal with over here?

anyways, i get my info from Petraeus testimony at capitol hill

really? so you withheld judgment til 4 days ago? very patient.

the whole point of this was that it is good when you use biased sources, but bad when I do? okay..

[racerx]

So in the racerx vortex, if a liberal holds 1 or 2 conservative views is he a conservative? That would make a lot of liberals conservatives and a lot of conservatives liberals.

And consider this, take Bush for example, if he had actually identified as a liberal instead of a conservative then he would actually be a conservative because he holds at least a few conservative views! However, since Bush claims to be a conservative he is actually a liberal because of the liberal views he holds.

my brain cells are committing suicide.

no. but if a 'liberal' holds even 1 'conservation' postilion, the 'conservatives' should support him on that position.
and if he had more support in those areas he would be encouraged to do even more in those areas.
it doesn't make any sense for a person to trash a guy on an issue where he's doing what the person said they wanted.
unless they just hate the guy and don't really care about the actual policies

why not support someone who you agree with on an issue(even they are in the other party, even if you disagree with them on other issues)
and why not criticize someone on issues you don't agree with (even if they are in your own party, even if you agree with them on most other issues)
hardly anyone does this. i'm just saying i don't get it


no. because bush enacted far more liberal polices than he did conservative policies. IMO

so i see your argument is no one should be labeled a liberal or a conservative, because everyone holds views of both.
and that was the point i was trying to make all along. i'm glad you agree. it's illogical when people blanket label, it's almost always not true.
the mainstream politicians i feel mostly agree on most issues, other than the political rhetoric


i'm burned out too. peace

[shitcunt]

If you have seen it a few times, why are you commenting on it?

Don't you tell liberals to stop bashing Fox unless you watch it?

I don't remember ever telling anyone that. I am just saying not to pretend you hate bias when you clearly don't.

[shitcunt]

no. but if a 'liberal' holds even 1 'conservation' postilion, the 'conservatives' should support him on that position.
and if he had more support in those areas he would be encouraged to do even more in those areas.
it doesn't make any sense for a person to trash a guy on an issue where he's doing what the person said they wanted.
unless they just hate the guy and don't really care about the actual policies

why not support someone who you agree with on an issue(even they are in the other party, even if you disagree with them on other issues)
and why not criticize someone on issues you don't agree with (even if they are in your own party, even if you agree with them on most other issues)
hardly anyone does this. i'm just saying i don't get it


no. because bush enacted far more liberal polices than he did conservative policies. IMO

so i see your argument is no one should be labeled a liberal or a conservative, because everyone holds views of both.
and that was the point i was trying to make all along. i'm glad you agree. it's illogical when people blanket label, it's almost always not true.
the mainstream politicians i feel mostly agree on most issues, other than the political rhetoric


i'm burned out too. peace

I agree with people who identify as conservatives on more stuff than people who identify as liberals. Therein lies the usefulness of such labels.

[SiriusDawg]

he gets his info from the inside, straight from the source, he works for the CIA. actually, he was in benghazi yelling for backup at the time of the attack

hey obama, u hear me? send the backup !!!! - shitcunt

Well remember, the CIA/FBI are the best of the best when saying something that makes Obama look bad or they do something good.

If they screw up or do something to praise Obama? They are liars, evil, etc....

Yet another brilliant Republican-logic

[BeetTheBoxer]

libitards

[RiotGrip]

sweet merciful crap! you really are sticking with the argument that since the drones didn't actually capture on camera the people who were begging for help that I am wrong. have you ever heard of splitting hairs? please look it up. you are the master of it.

You have real-time video of a building under siege by all kinds of mortars and heavy fire, you have a closed circuit camera of things going on inside the building with someone reporting what they are seeing over the phone, and you have 2 seals on the ground radioing in what is going on and their requests for backup.

You really think this video and audio did not make it to the white house that day? It was early evening and Obama was at the White House with Panetta and Biden. Why was Obama so unconcerned with what was going on?

How do you know there was no real time video playing in the white house?

Well, if this is your defense mechanism to not acknowledge you were completely duped by fox then fine.

You can call it splitting hairs, but I see a big difference between a video in playing in the whitehouse that clearly shows americans begging for help vs. a video from a drone that only gave enough data to put together a timeline of the events after the fact.

I want to see the true facts on this investigation, you've been pulling your pud to a fantasy of Obama leaving the whitehouse in disgrace over this.

[racerx]

Well, if this is your defense mechanism to not acknowledge you were completely duped by fox then fine.

You can call it splitting hairs, but I see a big difference between a video in playing in the whitehouse that clearly shows americans begging for help vs. a video from a drone that only gave enough data to put together a timeline of the events after the fact.

I want to see the true facts on this investigation, you've been pulling your pud to a fantasy of Obama leaving the whitehouse in disgrace over this.

IMO he wasn't duped. he's a smart guy who's disingenuous. it's like a game to pretend to be a paid party propagandist or something.
no one can really be as stupid as most of the posts i see here

[SiriusDawg]

Well, if this is your defense mechanism to not acknowledge you were completely duped by fox then fine.

Well, to be fair to him....that type of stupidity runs throughout the Fox contributors and viewers

[shitcunt]

Well, if this is your defense mechanism to not acknowledge you were completely duped by fox then fine.

You can call it splitting hairs, but I see a big difference between a video in playing in the whitehouse that clearly shows americans begging for help vs. a video from a drone that only gave enough data to put together a timeline of the events after the fact.

I want to see the true facts on this investigation, you've been pulling your pud to a fantasy of Obama leaving the whitehouse in disgrace over this.

Incredible

At least you admit there is a real time video now. It is amazing to me that you require the Seals actually on camera saying "Obama please help us". Can a drone even stop 5 feet away from a person and record a personal message? Fox never said that was the case. That is called splitting hairs. They had radio contact so they didn't really need the drone recording their faces as they asked for help. All of this is lost on you, sadly.

I doubt Obama ever even gets asked a straight question about any of this, let alone leaves in disgrace.

[SiriusDawg]

let alone leaves in disgrace.

Probably not. You all try to string up any shit possible and the public continues laughing at you for it.

You cry about the media....thinking people are listening...all the while everyone is laughing behind your back if not right in front of you.

[shitcunt]

Probably not. You all try to string up any shit possible and the public continues laughing at you for it.

You cry about the media....thinking people are listening...all the while everyone is laughing behind your back if not right in front of you.

I didn't realize people were laughing at me. I guess I will stop questioning dear leader.

[SiriusDawg]

I didn't realize people were laughing at me. I guess I will stop questioning dear leader.

I think everyone would benefit from just that.