That the Rolling Stones are, and always have been, way, way better than the Beatles.
This isn't even a conversation topic anymore.
Apples and oranges....
If I am ready to party, Stones are second to none. When I am in the mood to really dissect music, Ill go with the Beatles.
I think its more of a social thing now..."Are you a Stones person, or a Beatles person?" The smart ones are both.
What is the truth, what is the faithful lasting proof?
What is the central theme to this everlasting spoof?
guess like howard you haven't realized that when you preface a statement with "the fact of the matter is" everything else that follows is automatically bs and everyone ignores you?
ok, who writes "goo goo at a at a, fukin jew heeb"?
"fuckyoubigot i dont like you're sig" "repeated annoying comments"
The Lord is not my Shepherd for I am not a sheep.
I go back and forth on this. I think the Beatles had more range, but I like the style of the Stones better. Beatles could be a bit cheesy at times (thanks to McCartney), but I do think when they were at their best they wrote better songs than the Stones.
OP is a fan of phish.![]()
Friendship isn't about whom you have known the longest... It's about who came and never left your side.

Bookmarks